I am getting burnt out on these drawings! I decided to take a few days off and will pick up again tomorrow. Since I have committed to 30, I only 6 more to go by 4/17. I think I can handle that!

Cannon Beach, Oregon. Figure is too big, some foot prints too dark and too big in the distance.

Initially I had drawn this shack so that the beach and waves in the distance were parallel to the edge of the paper. After scanning it, I realized it looked better with a bit of an angle to it. Interestingly, a comment said it made no sense because the ocean is out there, straight ahead. Obviously, too realistic of a person, or someone who hasn’t taken a photo. Really, to me, a very interesting and odd comment and viewpoint!

Here is a scene of looking down onto a beach. The distant cliffs look okay, but the descent to the shore in the midground is definitely confusing.

During last Saturday’s zoom meeting, Ian talked about cross hatching. I use it a lot in ink drawing, but not in pencil since the idea for a lot of this 30-day challenge is to limit marks to horizontal and vertical. The idea is to create value studies, not finished drawings. Interesting lines do not make for good value studies of light, medium, dark. However, a simple use of lines, cross hatching, vertical, diagonal, horizontal, helps delineate shapes, such as curves. I based this drawing off a study of 3 pears by Cezanne.
Commentary
These studies are making more sense and getting easier to execute so that shapes have shape, even if not always understandable.
Looking good! I would have thought the ocean lines would be straight from the POV of the front of the house, and as your house is on a slanted perspective, it’s just about right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah! Now I get what that person is seeing. I was seeing a sea beyond the top of the papers, so the horizon is not visible at all . . .
LikeLiked by 1 person